Enough with the OS vs. Car analogy. That argumentation is so terribly flawed as to be useless.
It's all about end of life expectation. OSes have an EOL of roughly 5 years (in reality), but MS supports them beyond that--it's like a warranty (just not in all ways.) Cars have, at best, a 10 year, or 100K mile whichever comes first. That means your 1998 would be supported until 2008 at the longest, but the average American drives between 12000 and 20000 miles per year, giving you a EOL of between 8.3 to 5 years.
MS stops supporting NT after 8 years. You're getting a good deal. MS stops supporting Windows 98 in 5 years. You're still getting a good deal (in comparison to the car anaology).
If you assume that every 18 months computers get 2x as powerful (Moore's Law), and apply that same logic to cars...(here we go)...
Cars have been around in abundance only since 1910, that's 93 years. 93 years is 1116 months, which is 62 18-month periods of doubling in performance = 2,305,843,009,213,693,952 times more powerful.
Got a car (even a new 2003) that's that powerful or economical, or just plain "cooler"?
I bet not. Therefore, cars by comparison are a bad deal.
The lists go on and on. In short, car vs. pc or OS analogy = fubar.
|