|
|
User Controls
|
New User
|
Login
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac
|
Articles
|
Forums
|
Links
|
News
|
News Search
|
Reviews
|
|
|
|
News Centers
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
DVD
|
ActiveHardware
|
Xbox
|
MaINTosh
|
News Search
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats
|
The Lobby
|
Special Events Room
|
Developer's Lounge
|
XBox Chat
|
|
|
|
FAQ's
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
Windows 2000
|
Windows Me
|
Windows "Whistler" XP
|
Windows CE
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Xbox
|
DirectX
|
DVD's
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips
|
Registry Tips
|
Windows 95/98
|
Windows 2000
|
Internet Explorer 4
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
Windows NT Tips
|
Program Tips
|
Easter Eggs
|
Hardware
|
DVD
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews
|
Applications
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002
|
|
Hardware
|
Intel Personal Audio Player
3000
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse
Explorer
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info
|
About This Site
|
Affiliates
|
ANet Forums
|
Contact Us
|
Default Home Page
|
Link To Us
|
Links
|
Member Pages
|
Site Search
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
Credits
©1997/2004, Active Network. All
Rights Reserved.
Layout & Design by
Designer Dream. Content
written by the Active Network team. Please click
here for full terms of
use and restrictions or read our
Privacy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time:
14:15 EST/19:15 GMT | News Source:
ActiveWin.com |
Posted By: Robert Stein |
Thanks Sebastien. "As of November 7, 2002, prefix letters will be phased out of all Knowledge Base (KB) articles worldwide making it easier for you to request an article in a language other than your browser settings. Today, KB articles are published in 21 languages, each with an unrelated number scheme and prefix letter, for example, Q123454 is an English U.S. article. By eliminating the prefix and changing the numbers of some articles, we will make sure that all translations of any article will have exactly the same content number. Customers worldwide can view localized versions of articles by passing an internet standard for language locale and the content number. "
|
|
#1 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
10/24/2002 3:34:50 PM
|
I came across this website a couple weeks ago:
http://www.kbalertz.com/
Anybody familiar with it? Kind of a useful tool.
|
#2 By
11262 (172.163.140.245)
at
10/24/2002 5:44:30 PM
|
Anybody know why Q was designated for US English?
|
#3 By
3339 (65.198.47.10)
at
10/24/2002 7:13:39 PM
|
ahodes, it started that way because that's the way they started it? Jesus, and people wonder why I think most people are idiots!
What was the reason for doing it in the first place, fool?! Is it Query? Question? Quandary? Does it stand for "Q(uit) now, this will drive you nuts!"
|
#4 By
1845 (12.254.162.111)
at
10/24/2002 7:40:58 PM
|
Jerk is soft and cuddly as a teddy bear or was that a porcupine. ;-)
|
#6 By
3339 (64.175.42.65)
at
10/24/2002 10:10:49 PM
|
Good tip, Jcak. I was going to chime in that providing this functionality was in no way dependent on the service that realnames was providing briefly--they were actually providing a list of names, not the functionality.... but now that's evident. Does that registry entry become the search engine url for everything that is not a valid domain name though? I have address bar searching and Page Not Found/MSN search off, but would change it to enable KB lookups. And I can't check now because I'm not on a PC.
This post was edited by sodajerk on Thursday, October 24, 2002 at 22:14.
|
#7 By
3339 (64.175.42.65)
at
10/24/2002 10:24:00 PM
|
ahodes, "why -- let's highlight that -- WHY was Q designated for the English language?" You didn't answer: why?, moron--all you did was say, "I have no clue why, but if you want a stupid answer I'll tell you that: 'Once they chose Q, and it is Q still.'"
Great, great, fantastic...
....
Moron!
Even if Draganta's native language isn't English, he's smart enough to know that the other prefixes refer to lang/nationality, but that Q does not, and it's meaning is not apparent (even to a person who's native language isn't necessarily English). He knows that Microsoft is an American company and has workers that code and write in the English language, primarily, and certainly, firstly... (even if he's not American or his native language isn't English). He knows that the English/American version of the KB uses Q; even if he was born yesterday and has never encountered the KB until reading this article--so he doesn't know if this KB has predecessors or is actually translated from Sanskrit--he still knows that Q has a unique and probably originating meaning which is not apparent. He is still asking why Q was chosen, dip. He didn't ask: "So, hey, did they change the American version to Q from EN-US today when they decided to eliminate the prefix?", MORON. So he knows that and asked a question. What was your answer, and what in the hell do you know? Are you capable of thought ... that you actually think you've set me straight with your post when you say: "I never claimed to have any knowledge whatsoever as to -- here we go with the highlighting again-- WHY Q was chosen in the first place."? ...that you actually "think" calling you an idiot is an insult rather than a point of fact? Jesus Christ.
"Read the question and reponse"? JEEZ-US Christ! (I threw in the Jesus for you, Bob.)
Yes, my comment was uncalled for and immature. Your comment was uncalled for and idiotic.
This post was edited by sodajerk on Friday, October 25, 2002 at 01:23.
|
#8 By
1845 (12.254.162.111)
at
10/25/2002 1:03:02 AM
|
Thanks, Jerk. I'm all about NOT using His name in vain though.
|
#9 By
3339 (64.175.42.65)
at
10/25/2002 1:21:23 AM
|
I'm sorry, Bob, I thought it would be more polite than saying fscking @sshole. ;-)
|
#10 By
10802 (24.201.185.24)
at
10/25/2002 1:38:55 AM
|
#15 - This registry change will only affect queries prefixed by "mskb". IE will behave just as it did before for everything else that you type in the address bar.
I learnt this trick from an old IE power toy, and I currently use it regularly with a variety of different search engines, each with their own prefix.
You can also define such search prefixes very easily now with the latest version of Tweak UI.
|
#11 By
1845 (12.254.162.111)
at
10/25/2002 2:20:38 AM
|
Perhaps you're right, jerk. I'll have to think on that. In the mean time, think of the many wonderful, yet not so colorful, explatives that you could use "dork", "jerk", "dang", "drat", "oh my!". ;-)
|
#12 By
3339 (64.175.42.65)
at
10/25/2002 2:30:20 AM
|
I consider every word an option--there's a whole wonderful range of expression--but if I went around saying "dang, "drat," I'd consider myself a big "dork" and would be as offended by myself (which is worse) as you are by Blasphemy. I personally think some words are too good to be banished, out of taste, used only in "adult" company, or limited to the small sphere of ritual.
Come on... Step up to the plate, and say,"If ever it was appropriate to declare someone an idiot, this is it."
Jack, good stuff. Better than I could expect. Thanks.
This post was edited by sodajerk on Friday, October 25, 2002 at 05:40.
|
#13 By
3339 (64.175.42.65)
at
10/25/2002 2:38:01 AM
|
If anybodies interested, if you type "mskb" in IE on the Mac, you end up here:
http://guest.friendfinder.com/cgi-bin/public/page.cgi?start=1&pid=p27439
...which has a tame veneer--maybe it's just "friends"... like a Classmates.com, or something, after all they do have ChurchFriendFinder too (hey, hey, Bob), but to me, it screams "Front-for-white/sex-slave-trade." So... for all interested...
This post was edited by sodajerk on Friday, October 25, 2002 at 02:39.
|
#14 By
1845 (12.254.162.111)
at
10/25/2002 3:02:14 AM
|
Now that I've taken the lead from blue, I can be a kinder gentler BobSmith. No need for me to ruffle feathers just to incite a post war (not that I ever did that of course). As for the idiots themselves? Well any one stupid enough to spout their idiocy, probably won't benefit from me naming them.
|
#15 By
1845 (12.254.162.111)
at
10/25/2002 6:13:14 AM
|
antny - huh?
|
#16 By
1845 (12.254.162.111)
at
10/25/2002 6:46:44 AM
|
ahodes, you missed the ones that would have caused your post to be deleted.
|
|
|
|
|