I think it is a matter of precedent. If both wish to seek a means to manage development and respect one another's patents and IP, then it begins to explain the basis for this cooperation.
It establishes, if not a legal precedent, an operating framework where users of IP - entirely lawful and otherwise, may develop "commercialized" solutions - be they on Microsoft's proprietary platform, or Novell's model. In either case, both win and both establish the basis for defending their IP. It forces those who develop commercial products that also use OSS to move similarly, or face both Microsoft and Novell. It also establishes a working model that Microsoft can carry to the EU and other markets. It defines how each may respect the properties each owns and manages.
For those looking for the "bad" in this - why? Two companies and their leaders are working together. They represent two different ideologies, yet they have found a way to work with one another. That is a good thing and even if they fail, the effort is also a good thing. Where it benefits our customers, we ought to take advantage of it.
This post was edited by lketchum on Saturday, November 04, 2006 at 11:20.
|