| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Windows Server 2008 is 20% faster than Vista | |
|
||
| Time: 00:43 EST/05:43 GMT | News Source: Blorge | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum | ||
|
It seems Microsoft may have a successor (or replacement) for Vista after all and it’s already been released. Windows Server 2008 isn’t easy to configure as a desktop operating system but when done correctly can be 20% faster than Vista while retaining most of the same features. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 143 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:44:21 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2332 (66.92.78.241) at 3/14/2008 11:42:18 AM |
|
While Windows Server 2008 is pretty damn awesome, this article is ridiculous. The "benchmarks" have virtually no details, and none of the scores were 20%! More like 15%.
What would be interesting would be to pin down the specific reasons for this ~15% perf gain in these benchmarks. Vista SP1 and Win2k8 should be virtually identical. My bet is that it has something to do with integrated search / indexing / other services that are meant to increase responsiveness over time, but may hamper benchmark perf. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 143 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:44:21 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
