| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft joins OpenDoc committee, and the motive is…? | |
|
||
| Time: 00:07 EST/05:07 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum | ||
|
Microsoft has joined the INCITS/V1 Technical Committee, which plays a key role in the ratifying the OpenDocument format as an international standard, according to Ingrid Marson's report on ZDNet. Groklaw's Pamela Jones speculated that Microsoft's intentions may not be pure–the wolf in the hen house–and the company would like to sabotage ODF ratification and promote its own format, Open XML File Format. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 306 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:06:32 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 3/28/2006 7:58:56 AM |
| Gee, do you think? MS was part of the group that created ODF, but then they said they would never support it. Now they join the group that will ratify ODF. It doesn't take a genius like Parkkker to figure out what their motive is. I just hop eth eother members can slap them down when MS starts with their obstructionist nonsense. |
| #2 By 32132 (64.180.219.241) at 3/28/2006 10:41:27 AM |
|
ODF = patented by Sun
PDF = patented by Adobe Latch = moron |
| #3 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 3/28/2006 12:04:12 PM |
|
#2: Sorry, I can't hear your mumblings, Parkkker. I'm too busy running around trying to vain to secure IE from the latest "own-your-box" security exploit of the week.
|
| #4 By 32132 (64.180.219.241) at 3/28/2006 1:27:01 PM |
|
"Sorry, I can't hear your mumblings, Parkkker"
I forgot. Everytime I point out that the so-called "open" alternatives to Office are patented by Sun and Adobe, you stick your fingers in your ears and start humming. |
| #5 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 3/28/2006 1:59:21 PM |
| #5: I'm not sure why you keep pointing that out, since it's relevant to nothing. If I created a technology that I was going to donate to the world, I would still patent it so that some scumbag company wouldn't come around and patent it after the fact. First to file, not first to invent, don'tcha know. The fact is, MSXML has specially crafted strings attached that make it impossible for any GPL software to use their (cough) open standard. Neither PDF nor ODF have those strings -- only MS. But you already know this as I've told you before. See, MS doesn't pass the smell test. The world sees PDF and ODF as true open standards. They do not see MSXML and it's sneaky games as equivalents, no matter how much MS screams otherwise and no matter how many committees MS joins and subverts. |
| #6 By 32132 (64.180.219.241) at 3/28/2006 7:24:13 PM |
|
"Neither PDF nor ODF have those strings"
Thats out and out misrepresentation ... but thats the open source way. Lie. |
| #7 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 3/29/2006 8:13:23 AM |
|
#6: If that's the case, as you say, then why can GPL apps interact with PDF and ODF without any license problems? Why is that, Parkker? Pleas eprovide details to your claim.
|
| #8 By 32132 (64.180.219.241) at 3/29/2006 1:53:02 PM |
|
"then why can GPL apps interact with PDF and ODF without any license problems"
You are dumber than a sack of hammers. |
| #9 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 3/29/2006 3:36:08 PM |
|
#8: Here's a novel idea -- instead of insulting me, why not answer my question? If I'm so dumb, then please educate me (with links of course, not just your opinion). Or is it that you're full of sh!t and have no real answer (again)?
I may be dumb as a sack of hammers, but I can smell BS like yours a mile away. If you're an MS employee or agent astroturfing, then I could understand your rabid MS love. If you're doing it for free, you're the dumb one. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 306 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:06:32 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
