| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Will New UI Secure Office Users? | |
|
||
| Time: 09:35 EST/14:35 GMT | News Source: eWeek | Posted By: Chris Hedlund | ||
|
When Microsoft Corp. releases its next Office productivity suite in the second half of next year, it will unleash the most dramatic Office upgrade IT managers have seen since Office 95. Code-named Office 12, the update doesn't just signify a departure from Office 2003 but also a radical change in the user interface and in the look that Microsoft has consistently offered for years to users of its Windows-based applications. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 316 Last | Next |
The time now is
4:29:27 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/24/2005 10:59:13 AM |
| Who would want to upgrade, considering all the expensive retraining costs the new UI will generate. |
| #2 By 37 (67.37.29.142) at 10/24/2005 11:38:31 AM |
| Yeah, that makes sense Latch. NOT. |
| #3 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/24/2005 1:04:16 PM |
| #2: of course it makes sense. In every Windows TCO study, one of the things they ALWAYS bring up is the retraining costs to retrain your users if you switch from Windows to Linux. Apparently it's a lot different double-clicking an icon on the desktop in Linux than it is in Windows. So it naturally follows that if you make large changes to the UI in Office, massive training costs will result. Or is this just a bogus piece of FUD in MS' TCO studies?? |
| #4 By 37 (67.37.29.142) at 10/24/2005 2:11:59 PM |
|
There is no question that there will be training costs. I never question that, I only questioned "expensive". More than likely, this will SAVE companies expenses. This new UI is "substantially" more productive because it's exposing the tools to the users. Allowing them to access their tools more quickly is more productive and cost efficient. Allowing them access to tools that they may never known existed is more productive and cost efficient.
So, let's be sure to explain that training costs can be, and will be, offset by a more productive UI/Environment. I alone learned more than twice what I knew in the past about Powerpoint once I received the Office 12 build. Instead of spreading FUD guys, how about you look at the entire picture. Of course, this doesn't JIVE with your Open Source fan boy agendas, so heaven forbid they allow a glimmer of positive from MS. You guys are as predictable as ever. |
| #5 By 2960 (68.101.39.180) at 10/24/2005 4:14:04 PM |
|
What I would like to know is if Office 12 will be more _serviceable_.
The current office suite is a total mess installation and support wise. Hundreds of folders scattered all over the place. It's hard enough for us IT types. Users don't stand a chance. With the exception of spyware, no other ticket makes me cringe more than "Word crashes when launched" or something like that. They need to clean this mess up. TL |
| #6 By 2960 (68.101.39.180) at 10/24/2005 4:15:55 PM |
|
I'm not an open-source fanboy (I find much of it a pain in the ass), but I tried OOo 2.0 for the first time today and you know what?
It ain't bad folks. If Office 2003 wasn't provided to me, I doubt I'd pay the huge money for it. I could easily get by with OOo 2.0. TL |
| #7 By 37 (67.37.29.142) at 10/24/2005 4:24:57 PM |
|
I don't think OOo 2.0 is bad (I played with the 2.0 beta for quite awhile). And I didn't think OOo 1.0 was bad either.
But both 1.0 and 2.0 are horrible with MS Office compatibility (read: formatting loss is really bad). |
| #8 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 10/24/2005 4:56:18 PM |
|
What are you guys, Communists?!?!?! MS didn't innovate OOo, so it's total garbage and un-American. Besides, it's based on 27 year old Netscape code, so it's bound to format your hard disk the first chance it gets.
btw I'm going out as Parkkker on Hallowe'en. |
| #9 By 37 (67.37.29.142) at 10/24/2005 4:57:49 PM |
|
"btw I'm going out as Parkkker on Hallowe'en. "
Good luck with that.. |
| #10 By 1401 (65.255.137.20) at 10/24/2005 6:00:17 PM |
| that's nice... |
| #11 By 32132 (142.32.208.231) at 10/24/2005 7:44:39 PM |
|
I'm going out as Latch on Halloween. I plan to wait outside peoples homes and find out which costume gets the most candy, then I'm going to make a bad copy of it and claim it is just as good, and then whine and snivel when I don't get any candy. This post was edited by NotParker on Monday, October 24, 2005 at 19:46. |
| #12 By 20505 (216.102.144.11) at 10/24/2005 9:56:11 PM |
|
funny i'm going as bill gates.
i defy anyone to go as mcneely. |
| #13 By 3653 (68.52.61.116) at 10/24/2005 11:05:09 PM |
|
For Halloween, I'm going to put scratches all over my face, and pretend I'm a nano.
Or maybe I'll dress as a big number ZERO, and pretend I'm redhat's desktop market share. or maybe i can put a firefox logo shirt on and tell people i'm an 3l1t haxR |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 316 Last | Next |
The time now is
4:29:27 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
