| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Should I Be Spanked? | |
|
||
| Time: 12:36 EST/17:36 GMT | News Source: Microsoft Watch | Posted By: Todd Richardson | ||
|
Welcome, XXX.com readers, but I bet you've surfed to the wrong place: Despite the racy headline, we're talking Monad (with an "m," not a "g").
So what's with the spanking reference? Some Microsoft advocates over on the Channel 9 Web site seem to think that's what I deserve for telling the truth about what's happening with Longhorn. (Note to Mr. ManicKernel on Channel 9: You are the one who needs a spanking. And then to be put to bed with some warm milk and a pacifier. All IMHO, of course.) | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 145 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:56:56 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2459 (69.22.124.157) at 6/14/2005 7:17:17 PM |
|
Forget the spanking. She should be smacked for regularly publishing articles about technical details she has no knowledge of.
Example: At PDC 2003, Microsoft made it clear that "Longhorn" was not a managed OS down to the kernel. They had slides with block diagrams showing both the Win32 and WinFX subsystems side-by-side. They emphasized (especially to C++ devs) that you can still write unmanaged code if perf was the overriding issue (not to mention backward compatibility). No one with a competent grasp of the subject matter should have come away from PDC 2003 with the notion that "Longhorn" was 100% managed code (did she attend/watch any actual sessions?). Even if you were ignorant enough to do so, you would've quickly found this belief to be unfounded if you read any MS (or competent 3rd-party) blogs on the subject, checked the "Longhorn" Developer Center, looked at the slides/presentations from PDC 2003 that were made available to the general public for a limited time for free, watched the .NET Show, MSDN TV, MS Webcasts, etc., or checked the freakin' SDK. Slides from WinHEC followed which pointed out the same thing. Channel 9 coverage pointed out the same thing. It was not something that was hidden nor a "dirty little secret". This post was edited by n4cer on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 at 19:17. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 145 Last | Next |
The time now is
12:56:56 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
