| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft Puts SQL Server in Line With Rivals on Backup Databases | |
|
||
| Time: 10:54 EST/15:54 GMT | News Source: ComputerWorld | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
Microsoft last month announced that it would no longer charge Software Assurance customers for backup database servers, provided that the systems remain off unless the main database crashes or is corrupted and that they aren't used for processing on a regular basis. Previously, users had to pay a variable fee to install a backup SQL Server database for disaster recovery purposes, said Sunny Charlebois, a product manager in Microsoft's worldwide licensing and pricing group. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 311 Last | Next |
The time now is
9:21:47 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 6/7/2004 12:04:02 PM |
|
I wonder how common this scenario is?
Most companies I have worked with use their backup recovery systems for pre-production testing. So that means they aren't turned off... however they aren't used for production either. Perhaps the journalist just doesn't understand technology. |
| #2 By 19992 (164.214.4.61) at 6/7/2004 12:46:17 PM |
|
#1
There are other methods that can be used to achieve this. See below #2 "Isn't it necessary that a back-up server be up-to-date with the main database." Kind of. The way that my company is handling it is we use our EMC SAN to take BCVs of the environment at a regular schedule and replicate it across the WAN where it would wait for us to boot the failover target in the event of a failure. This post was edited by happyguy on Monday, June 07, 2004 at 12:48. |
| #3 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at 6/8/2004 12:14:05 PM |
| diaphanein - Wow, that's worse than our experience with Oracle. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 311 Last | Next |
The time now is
9:21:47 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
