| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Windows .Net Server: Worth the wait? | |
|
||
| Time: 17:16 EST/22:16 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Byron Hinson | ||
|
Since rolling out Visual Studio.Net in February--an event that marked the official launch of .Net--Microsoft has been waving its magic wand and applying .Net fairy dust to its Enterprise Servers. A shipping version of Commerce Server got the .Net treatment when it was released in April, as did the beta of Content Management Server, released earlier this month. Now, after a year's delay, Windows .Net Server--the mother of all Enterprise Servers--has arrived in beta form, with a shipping product expected by the end of the year. Interestingly, Windows .Net Server is receiving a less extreme .Net-ification than other Enterprise Servers, although many incremental improvements have been made. Even Microsoft admits that few customers will rip and replace their Windows 2000 Server in favor of Windows .Net Server--although the company hopes that the new release could be just the incentive Windows NT 4.0 Server customers need to upgrade. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 301 Last | Next |
The time now is
3:45:07 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 931 (63.169.175.28) at 7/24/2002 7:05:22 PM |
| win2k with steroids and wpa... no it was not worth the wait. |
| #2 By 135 (208.50.201.48) at 7/24/2002 11:10:56 PM |
|
It may not be worth replacing Win2k servers with it, but .NET Server has a lot of cool features. It now allows for headless operation, IIS is majorly improved, it will have the robust new features from COM+ v1.5.
Is it worth upgrading a file server? No. Is it worth upgrading an app server? Hell yes. What about web hosting? You betcha, ken. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 301 Last | Next |
The time now is
3:45:07 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
