| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
MS loses Front Page trademark fight | |
|
||
| Time: 09:33 EST/14:33 GMT | News Source: The Register | Posted By: Byron Hinson | ||
|
Glasgow Web designers Front Page Design have defeated Microsoft in a legal battle to register the firm's name as a trademark. After a five-year David vs Goliath-style legal battle, the Scottish firm won its case in a hearing before the Trade Mark Registry in London last Thursday, September 6. Microsoft objected to Front Page Design using its name for any activities connected with Web site design. But the hearing has ruled that the Glasgow firm had established a right to use the name (it applied for a trademark in 1995) before Microsoft introduced its Web site design software in the UK. Front Page Design won the right to continue using its name and to protect it by law. It was awarded £1,500 costs, which fail to cover legal expenses of £25,000. The Web site of the firm was not part of the case. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 301 through 302 of 302 Prev | First |
The time now is
10:55:25 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 301 through 302 of 302 Prev | First |
The time now is
10:55:25 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
