| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Microsoft still rules server OS market | |
|
||
| Time: 13:48 EST/18:48 GMT | News Source: CNET | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
And the software potentate looks secure to retain its lead in the worldwide market for server operating systems through 2007, Framingham, Mass.-based IDC reported Wednesday. During that period, shipments of both Microsoft's Windows and the open-source Linux are projected to see higher annual shipments, with the overall market for server operating systems expected to grow at a rate of 9.1 percent per year. In comparison, the market for client operating systems is projected to grow 7.5 percent annually. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 26 through 50 of 510 Prev | Last | Next |
The time now is
10:43:22 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #26 By 1845 (12.209.152.69) at 10/10/2003 7:31:35 PM |
| parker, if only Bush had stated that as his reason for attacking Iraq instead of making bogus claims about WMD and a Hussein/bin Laden link, I wouldn't have a problem. The issue isn't that we went to Iraq. The issue is that Bush lied about why we went to Iraq. Whatever Bush's real motives are, he never shared them with us. Perhaps it was to do as you say, save our Israeli ally. Perhaps it was oil. Perhaps he is under hypnosis from the dragon in his garage (the same dragon which seems to convince you and daz that I'm a leftist). Who knows! The point is, he lied about his reasons for going to Iraq. |
| #27 By 135 (208.186.90.91) at 10/10/2003 10:28:31 PM |
|
parker - I really have no time for you.
Bush crossed the line. He put Republican party interests in front of the interests of the United States Citizens. His time in office is over, and no amount of hyperbole, false representation of our positions or just down right lies is going to save you. |
| #28 By 135 (208.186.90.91) at 10/10/2003 11:03:15 PM |
|
BobSmith - "The reason I'm not a Democrat, is that I don't like many of the things they preach. I also think the often the don't believe what they preach. They simply say what they think people want to hear. I'm annoyed by dishonesty. "
Could you give some examples? I'll be honest. I listen to people within the Democratic party, and the issues are all over the board. So sometimes the candidates do say things to the party base that they may not act upon. But it's unclear to me how Republicans are any different, don't they placate certain special interest groups by dangling a carrot in front of them that says "We may or may not vote on your issue, but we can guarantee you the other guys won't"? Just curious... I think that's what politics is largely about. "And, of course, I don't do well when Clinton is defended. " I don't know that there was any other choice. He was attacked unfairly. I think the mistake Democrats made was not in not defending him vigorously enough. Considering the accusations made by the Republicans towards Clinton were fabrications and lies(Whitewater, troopergate, travelgate, filegate, Vince Foster, yada yada)... they should have stood up and just said "Look, we are sick and tired of this!" But the problem was that the evidence that these were all lies didn't come out until well into his Presidency. It took people like David Brock leaking the Republican manipulations to really understand where all this stuff was coming from. But by then it was too late, the meme was planted, and you and many others believed it, including many Democrats. They did the same thing to Gore in 2000. How many times have you heard "Gore invented the internet" as a joke? Well you know what, he did help in it's creation. Vince Cerf who did invent the internet agreed, he said Gore was the only Senator who would listen to them and sponsored the bill to fund it. And parker is just continuing the trend here through 2004. Oh yeah, and I'm sick and tired of it! To my mind that means standing up for what we believe, and putting out better candidates to advocate those positions. i.e. not wimps like Gray Davis, but not loudmouths like Newt Gingrich either. |
| #29 By 1845 (12.209.152.69) at 10/10/2003 11:18:04 PM |
|
Gotta run, but really quickly...
Democrats. A few things Democrats generally embrace or at least defend - abortion, homosexuality, premarital sexual relations. Clinton. I'll ignore your pro-Clinton comments. And you, try to ignore any anti-Clinton comments I make. Briefly, my beef with him personally is that he cheated on his wife, lied to his wife and the American people, didn't, in my opinion, show real remorse for his actions. His grand jury performance - that depends on how you define the word 'is' - was appalling. Policy aside, he did some very bad (in my book) things which demonstrated what he thought of my trust, his wife's trust, and the trust of the American people. That's my biggest beef with Clinton. |
| #30 By 135 (208.186.90.91) at 10/11/2003 1:18:44 PM |
|
BobSmith - Interesting.
Send me email, I'll explain some things to you. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 26 through 50 of 510 Prev | Last | Next |
The time now is
10:43:22 PM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
