| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Chrome 10 vs. Internet Explorer 9 vs. Firefox 4: FIGHT! | |
|
||
| Time: 09:04 EST/14:04 GMT | News Source: ComputerWorld | Posted By: Andi Stabryla | ||
|
Seth Rosenblatt asks, "how do they perform when tested under identical conditions?": [Our] gauntlet of benchmarks ... considered JavaScript and HTML5 performance ... boot times and memory usage. ... Though the competition is extremely close in ... JavaScript rendering, Firefox 4 [wins] HTML5 processing, boot time, and memory usage. ... Firefox 4 is the winner this time around. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 303 Last | Next |
The time now is
7:34:27 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 2960 (72.205.26.164) at 3/29/2011 10:17:42 AM |
|
You know, this is like doing a test between the Porsche 911, and the 911 Turbo.
Who gives a shit. Both are faster than any human needs. Both wrap around a tree equally well. Both are horribly overpriced. To me, speed isn't the defining factor for a browser any more. They are all fast enough. What matters is how well I can customize it to MY needs, and not the needs of the dude who wrote the code. And, for me, FF still wins that battle. I will say FF4 has me pissed off and I'm not using it right now. Way too many of my extensions won't work under FF4 and I just don't have time to deal with finding replacements right now. |
| #2 By 15406 (99.240.77.173) at 3/30/2011 6:44:26 AM |
| #1: I would guess the all of your extension will be updated within the month so you just have to play the waiting game. |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 303 Last | Next |
The time now is
7:34:27 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
