| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Update for Outlook 2007 (KB933493) | |
|
||
| Time: 09:48 EST/14:48 GMT | News Source: ActiveWin.com | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
This update fixes a problem in which a calendar item that is marked as private is opened if it is found by using the Search Desktop feature. The update also fixes performance issues that occur when you work with items in a large .pst file or .ost file. | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 318 Last | Next |
The time now is
8:41:21 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 23275 (24.179.4.158) at 6/13/2007 10:56:54 AM |
|
This is a re-release of an OL2K7 Patch that was originally published on April 13th, 2007.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933493 That patch, originally available sans the WGA validation, transformed [for the better] OL2K7 performance for users with larger .OST and .PST files. The stand-alone installer will check to see if a system already has the update applied. Some here wondered why the update was not published via Windows, or Microsoft Updates - vice the direct DL. It was a good question, but since the same two files are updated in both versions of the patch, it is hard to understand why. |
| #2 By 2960 (24.254.95.224) at 6/13/2007 12:16:11 PM |
|
Two updates today, and I downloaded both. BOTH required WGA Validation.
I am SO GD sick of this WGA shit. TL |
| #3 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 6/13/2007 12:38:27 PM |
| #2: You need to understand that it's for your protection. What if, one day in the middle of a session on your PC that has been working fine for years, it suddenly went pirated? Who would warn you, repeatedly, that your copy just might maybe perhaps possibly be pirated, but they're not sure? And don't for a second think that it has anything at all to do with MS' attempts to raise sales numbers by extinguishing pirated copies because 1) the pirates have already worked around WGA so it's only a nuisance for real, paying customers, and 2) MS says it's all about protecting you, the user. What else do you need to know? |
| #4 By 23275 (24.179.4.158) at 6/13/2007 12:44:55 PM |
|
#2, "Persistent Porosity" - WGA never stops and it's full of holes.
I have to agree with you on being sick of it. Customers don't like it and don't understand it. While I understand it, I don't like it one lick - at least not as it has evolved. You read my own personal horror story with it and how much effort, time [wasted] and pure BS I went through on one of my own systems with it. I don't think there is a better way, either - so I can't offer any suggestions to any of our customers, and privately, I do worry: "What mix of events and simple, lawful use, will again one day, fire a WGA event that is not compatible with what I, or a customer is running?" Like some bomb sitting out there, or a persistent flaw in one of a car's sub-systems and wondering "when" it's going to break next. A couple of similar examples come to mind - recently, we added yet more layers of access control to our centers - over and above [get this] 24/7 color cams, IR emitters for night imagery, motion sensing, heat sensing, contact systems, biaxial locks, key pads, card readers and layers of concentric four hour doors, we added individually assigned keys/key pads to lower level access points and even the damn elevators - this on top of armed stationary and roaming security guards and some very dedicated police officers that all but live in our parking lots. Why? Well, we could see where people were trying to leverage lower level entry points, so we added the individual keys to further restrict access to upper level areas where production systems are located - lower levels house machinery, only - generators, etc.. The relevance is that like WGA, businesses seem to have to continually add new layers of protections to protect the interests of their customers and employees. It sucks, frankly, and opposite memories of a time when we didn't need locks of any kind, it is particularly maddening. [and we're in a really nice area!] Another example: some years ago I liked to tune and wrench on old sports cars - one had this very weird clamping mechanism that held the down-pipe to the exhaust manifold - one never knew when these clamps, which were a nightmare to replace, would go out. Like WGA, I didn't/don't know when it will/would bite me, or a customer next. Now, as nutty as all the layers of physical security are, we do have SOS and we have made it pretty simple on our staff and customers to gain access to entry control points where they can be escorted into interior spaces - the point is that WGA needs work and until that work is done, it needs to be suspended.... or we need to convince people to stop stealing. |
| #5 By 23275 (24.179.4.158) at 6/13/2007 12:49:56 PM |
|
At my last sentence at #4, I made no sense at all... zip -
I meant to say/compare, that despite the complexity we felt we were forced to add, we managed to make it easy to use - MS needs to re-tool WGA, or ditch it until they do. Sorry - patch Tuesday made it a long one. |
| #6 By 23275 (24.179.4.158) at 6/13/2007 12:55:20 PM |
| #3, Lawyers, and accountants - they have to be behind WGA. They have to add value that can be tied to revenue in some way and they have their own, weird, wildly disparate way of seeing things - even in small businesses one can see and feel this influence and it very often beats the life out of "producers" - those that really do add great value. Controlling that influence is harder to do than people are willing to admit. I think HR is the only area that can be worse in the context of influence. I know I have not always had access to what worked best for us and I can only imagine that in a corporation as big as MS, it has to be at least equally hard to control. |
| #7 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 6/13/2007 1:05:36 PM |
| #6: As much as I grumble about MS, they do deserve to see their profit realized on every copy they sell. Unfortunately, this is another example of how MS can abuse their monopoly to their advantage, but this time the one abused is their own customers. No other company could pull this stunt if they didn't have essentially a captive audience. |
| #8 By 15406 (216.191.227.68) at 6/13/2007 2:42:44 PM |
| Speaking of Lookout, does anyone know a way around its ignorant problem of only informing you of new mail in your primary mailbox? I have 2 mailboxes attached and it will flag me if the first account receives a new mail, but the second could be stuffed to capacity without me knowing. I have an associate at a different company who has the same problem. This is ridiculous. Any workaround? |
| #9 By 54556 (67.131.75.3) at 6/13/2007 3:36:48 PM |
| Here is a 3rd party solution http://www.slipstick.com/addins/notify.asp |
| #10 By 868449 (27.159.217.201) at 12/14/2012 12:21:58 PM |
|
Oh my goodness! an remarkable article dude. Thank you Yet I'm experiencing issue with ur rss . Don't know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there any person getting identical rss challenge? Any person who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
<a href=http://www.buyjordansgo.com/kids-jordan-shoes-c-133.html>jordan 3 for cheap</a> <a href=http://www.discount-airjordans.com/womens-jordan-shoes-c-139.html>mens jordan shoes</a> |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 318 Last | Next |
The time now is
8:41:21 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
