| ActiveMac | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise |
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveMac |
|
Articles |
|
Forums |
|
Links |
|
News |
|
News Search |
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
DVD |
|
ActiveHardware |
|
Xbox |
|
MaINTosh |
|
News Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANet Chats |
|
The Lobby |
|
Special Events Room |
|
Developer's Lounge |
|
XBox Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows "Whistler" XP |
|
Windows CE |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopTechTips |
|
Registry Tips |
|
Windows 95/98 |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Internet Explorer 4 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Windows NT Tips |
|
Program Tips |
|
Easter Eggs |
|
Hardware |
|
DVD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Applications |
|
Microsoft Windows XP Professional |
|
Norton SystemWorks 2002 |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Intel Personal Audio Player 3000 |
|
Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Affiliates |
|
ANet Forums |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
|
Links |
|
Member Pages |
|
Site Search |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits |
 |
Vista's user account protection flawed | |
|
||
| Time: 01:09 EST/06:09 GMT | News Source: VNUNet | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum | ||
|
Microsoft's attempts to provide compatibility for older applications in its forthcoming Windows Vista operating system is opening the door for attackers, security vendor Symantec alleged in a study about the software's user account protection scheme. Matthew Conover, a principal security researcher with Symantec, wrote in a whitepaper that he " expects several […] privilege escalation vulnerabilities to be discovered." "Windows Vista's developers had to choose the best way to improve the overall security model while still retaining the most backward compatibility. While most of their decisions seem reasonable, two particular decisions lead to several seemingly intractable implementation flaws." | ||
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 307 Last | Next |
The time now is
4:27:53 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
| #1 By 23443 (12.35.96.66) at 8/2/2006 8:42:46 AM |
|
Quote from the article:
However, in his white paper, Symantec's Conover described several ways that allow applications to obtain additional privileges in early versions of the Windows Vista Beta. Those security vulnerabilities have since been patched, but he added that security researchers and malware creators are likely to find new security vulnerabilities. End Quote Again, Symantec found problems in an earlier build, which have been fixed, but they say there could be more vulnerabilities. In other news, the sun rose in the East today. Sour grapes. End of story. Nothing to see here, move along. TowerDave |
| #2 By 13783 (66.176.20.75) at 8/2/2006 9:46:21 AM |
|
Dear God when is Symantec gonna stop posting crap findings based on builds that are months old and that have ALREADY been fixed in current beta builds?
They seem to be saying: "Hey you'll still need our products 'cause Vista will be so insecure as previous versions of Windows." when in fact everyone knows and will find out for themselves that is not the case. |
| #3 By 10022 (69.204.110.203) at 8/2/2006 9:21:30 PM |
|
If I hear one more person whine about having to be admin to change the time I'm going to flip.
Really, how many people are finding this to be a huge problem? Did they somehow change the efault behavior of XP that automatically syncs the time with time.windows.com? Who is having this problem? |
|
Write Comment
Return to News |
Displaying 1 through 25 of 307 Last | Next |
The time now is
4:27:53 AM
ET.
Any comment problems? E-mail us |
